PhilosoBits Biweekly #032 - How To Panic | March 30, 2024

How To Panic


Writer and former option trader Nassim Taleb says that "if it’s worth panicking, panic early." The Stoics would appear to agree, with Seneca spending much of Letter XCI in Letters From A Stoic emphasizing that misfortunes are made worse when not prepared for. In matters both personal and societal, our key to making disruptions less disruptive is preparedness.

Often conjuring images of hyper reaction to a suddenly-realized vulnerable state, we tend to associate panic negatively, relegating it to something perceived as unproductively excessive. It's here that we benefit from meeting with the words of 17th century philosopher Thomas Hobbes: "Hell is the truth seen too late." It's a quip as sobering societally as it is personally.

In your own life, what are the recurring pains that could be avoided (or at minimum, minimized) with a bit of extra diligence? Future looking, what is an experience that, engaging the Stoic freedom to hold dispreferred indifferents, you would prefer to avoid? Be personal, practical, and specific, such that your solution can be, too.

We don't panic by overreacting. We panic by rightly acting in advance, prepared, to the best of our ability, to recover from whatever fate may deal us.

From increasing the amount that you save, to exercising more regularly, to going for that checkup, there are any number of shapes that productive panic can take. While we don't decide what comes, we can decide how prepared we are—how resilient we'll be—whenever it does. 

Decide what's worth your own personal panic; in the form of thoughtful and pointed action, panic now.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #031 - Decide, Or It Will Be Decided | March 17, 2024

Decide, Or It Will Be Decided


Worth remembering about the staple Stoic text that is Marcus Aurelius' Meditations is that it was not a book written for public consumption. It was a personal wartime journal Aurelius kept as a means of remaining grounded during the tumultuous periods he endured as Roman emperor. The broad-reaching utility of its insights aside, the book itself presents a useful meta commentary on the value of knowing who one wants to be. 

Emperor for 19 years, there was no shortage of temptations to be who others wanted him to be. This journal of epithets to himself reminded him of what mattered, of who he wanted to be, and how he wanted to operate both as a leader and a human. What became known as Meditations was truly his own set of meditative principles that would inform all things.

Demonstrated by Marcus Aurelius' efforts in capturing lessons to himself is an awareness of the following: If you do not decide who you are, it will be decided for you.

In an age where our attention is the most sought-after currency, the ability to consciously select and manage one's inputs is a skill. Doing this well, however, requires a refined understanding of who and how we we wish to be—our principles, our values, our commitments. Aurelius knew what his were, and filtered everything through that lens accordingly.

It serves us to answer a question encouraged by Aurelius for ourselves: "...how can [you] live the best life possible in the time that is granted..?” In specificity, what does this look like? Is room left for the answer to evolve over time? Is there a willingness to adapt or discard what is no longer useful?

Whatever the answers are, be the one who defines them. 

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #030 - You Need To Be Imbalanced | March 3, 2024

You Need To Be Imbalanced


Book IV of Discourses And Selected Writings finds slave-turned-teacher and philosopher Epictetus describing the necessary dichotomies that accompany deciding who one wants to be. In the constructively-direct manner so distinctive of Stoic writing, his diatribe leaves no room for misinterpretation.

“And if you are committed to making progress and ready to devote yourself to the effort, then give up everything else," Epictetus urges. "Otherwise your ambivalence will only ensure that you don’t make progress. [...] To the extent you cultivate one [area] you will fall short in the other.”

The Stoics pulled no punches, and in our chosen pursuits, nor should we. A life of consequence is one of vicious imbalance—the aim being imbalance toward that which you deem most significant (temporarily or perpetually), and relative indifference toward the rest. Engaging this concept productively requires clarity in what the season demands, and of what you demand of the season.

Doing what few do requires embracing what few embrace, including that of meaningful progress anywhere requiring conscious disengagement elsewhere.

Training for a marathon requires one type of discipline, positioning oneself for a promotion or raising children, others still. Any endowed responsibility or meaningful pursuit will require periods of imbalance in the direction of your primary intent. 

You're only pained by what you "missed out" on when you don't fully believe in what you were trying to gain. For this reason, know what it is you're trying to gain. Be necessarily imbalanced along the way.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #029 - How To Persist | February 18, 2024

How To Persist


In Effortless, author Greg McKeown speaks of how even the right pursuits can be exhausting because of how we’re doing them. There’s the identifying and deciding of the action, and then the discipline in determining how to do it sustainably.

This is similar to "Zone Two" training, a concept addressed in depth by Peter Attia, and one practiced by ultra endurance athlete Rich Roll among others. In an interview on The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, Rich Roll describes Zone Two training as a level of output that can consistently be achieved every day. It’s slower than what one is capable of (i.e. intentionally not max output), but can be maintained. 

"It’s truly the ability to efficiently persist,” Roll describes in the episode. “The prize doesn’t go to the fastest guy—it goes to the guy who slows down the least.”

Results are experienced by the individual who slows down the least. Embedded in the physical practice of ultra endurance training is the Stoic virtue of temperance, or moderation—the paradox within it being that one can do too much of what is obviously good, too. A concise description of temperance is offered by Daily Stoic: "Doing the right thing in the right amount in the right way.” 

The rightness of the act is defined by one’s larger intent; the amount is defined by what serves that intent, and the way, by what serves the intent in the agreed-upon amount. 

Anything worth doing is worth making it easy for ourselves to keep doing. It is not a matter of pursuing what's easy, but rather, of making what's worth pursuing, easy.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #028 - Regain The Rhythm | February 4, 2024

Regain The Rhythm


If you were to go back in time thirty days, what would you see? Some might see in themselves a renewed sense of vigor, candid reflection, immersion in vicious goal writing, vivid hope, clear intent. Where are you now?

Book VI of Marcus Aurelius' personal wartime journal-turned essential Stoic guide finds him encouraging himself, and subsequently others, to regain equilibrium whenever lost. "Return to yourself with all speed," he implores, "and never lose the rhythm for any longer than you must." Aurelius then reminds us that the more frequently we return to ourselves, the easier we'll find it to be the self we wish to be. 

The Stoic acknowledges the disruptions and distractions of life and our vulnerability to fatigue, and equally, our ability to review and reset. Do not make the mistake that is restricting this to one day a year.

Each day presents the opportunity to review and reset, to rebalance, to regain the rhythm with which we entered the year. Each day you decide to keep the pace you set for yourself, consciously operating as the person capable of doing so.

When describing the journey of someone who consistently reached higher goals, 10x Is Easier Than 2x author Dr. Benjamin Hardy offers the following: "Chad exhibits a quality that only the world's top achievers do: The ability to rapidly accept a new identity." 

Falling short of our intentions is not a lack of willpower; it is, wholly and specifically, a lack of consistent realignment with who we intend to be.

Review, regain, repeat.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #027 - Resolve To Think Better | January 21, 2024

Resolve To Think Better


Implicit throughout Stoic texts is the encouragement of accountability for everything that happens to us by way of owning our thoughts about them. Put another way, what we control in our experiences is how we experience them. Understood in its fullness, our capacity for thinking is the superpower that arms us to adopt the useful perspective in all things. 

The degree to which we’re able to extract the constructive from the destructive can be the difference between a life of reward or resent. Purposeful thinking allows us to decide what we make of any given moment.

English painter Sir Joshua Reynolds is credited with saying that “there is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labor of thinking.” The phrasing carries impact, revealing a defining quality of critical thinking that has us slow to engage it: its perceived laboriousness. It’s not so much the function of thinking we’re averse to, but the function of challenging it, of choosing to assess its merit further. 

Many of our judgements are passively formed. From our upbringing and any mentalities instilled, to the media consumed, it could be argued that by a certain point, much of our thinking has been done for us, and thus, we often have to feel sufficiently compelled to adjust it on our own.

Let 2024 be a year in which you consciously engage your capacity for active thinking—for refined thinking. May we think better to live better.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #026 - Commit To Living | January 7, 2024

Commit To Living


In his seminal work titled On The Shortness of Life, Stoic philosopher Seneca offers a reframing of time and existence by way of the sobering, metaphor-driven rhetoric so characteristic of him:

"And so there is no reason for you to think that any man has lived long because he has grey hairs or wrinkles; he has not lived long—he has existed long. For what if you should think that that man had had a long voyage who had been caught by a fierce storm as soon as he left harbor, and, swept hither and thither by a succession of winds that raged from different quarters, had been driven in a circle around the same course? Not much voyaging did he have, but much tossing about." -Seneca

Life without conscious design is indeed nothing more than tossing about. A new year sees many individuals lean into the "reset" by initiating new behaviors or denouncing previous ones. The eventual challenge with any single, isolated resolution, however, is a lack of context. Months pass, vigor fades, and rhythms resume, revealing the element key to sustaining any intended behavior: committing, first, to how we want to live. [the why goes away, the what changes; whys are useful in the micro, risky in the macro]

There are many ways to be a certain type of person; there are few ways to be that person in the way you want to—in the way most conducive to your unique and specific type of flourishing.

Sometimes outcomes elude us because we aren't pursuing them in a manner we can sustain.To live is to commit to how we can best live—that is, to how we can keep wanting to.

What is the context so compelling that any content can be overcome? What adjustments can be made such that you aren't being dragged, but driving? With a disciplined focus on our sphere of control and a disciplined acceptance of original hands dealt, what does the life we want to sustain look like? 

Operate accordingly.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #025 - Love Your Lot | December 23, 2023

Love Your Lot


Prevalent among Stoic themes is acceptance, not of the woe-is-me relegation variety, but of the considered recognition that what is meant to be in the present moment is what is. And in every passing moment, we have the choice to rest contented or conflicted.

While it bears emphasizing that what is (read: what exists, what is true) presently may not be what will always be, the Stoic does not cling to this. The Stoic clings, instead, to what the moment requires of her and to how she is meant to be enriched by it.

To "accept," in etymological truth, is to willingly receive, to welcome, to agree with. Book VI of Meditations sees Roman emperor and philosopher Marcus Aurelius punctuate the idea of active acceptance with the advisement to "adapt yourself to the circumstances in which your lot has cast you; and love these people among whom your lot has fallen, but love them in all sincerity."

Love what you've chosen, and as for what you haven't chosen, choose to love what it can make you. Love the process of learning, and of becoming the more realized, post-revelation version of you. Love that there not being another you means you have the opportunity to be the best one. Love that your unique contribution can only be made by you, and make it all the more. Love your lot, and remember that you're in it, too.

This is not a thin encouragement to smile through it, or to feign joy while in denial; it is a call to thoughtfully identify the good, the useful, the beneficial, and to consciously learn from the rest. 

In the loving and learning is how we live.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #024 - Set Your Own Standard | December 10, 2023

Set Your Own Standard


In Letters From A Stoic, playwright and philosopher Seneca warns us that "excellences withers without an adversary." In any competitive arena, one’s “adversary” is obvious. In a matter of seconds, you or they become the standard. It’s no surprise, then, that many races in which an Olympic or World Record is set yields many a personal best among runners in that same race. The excellence so clearly present in the winner brings forth new levels of excellence in all.

These underemphasized resulting achievements—excellence influenced—are each incredible in their own right; medal or otherwise, the act of outdoing oneself is proof enough of having risen to the occasion. 

For many of us, our adversary is unlikely to be physicalized in the form of an elite athlete running with all their might less than a foot away from us. The infinite player recognizes that she's playing against herself. Sometimes our adversary must be our own comfort, our own intolerance for challenge.

The Stoics encourage stress inoculation, the regular controlled exposure to suboptimal conditions as practical training against reliance on external comforts. It is not merely about ice baths or fasting, but about consciously setting one's own standards. 

Personalized excellence is the dedicated adherence to one’s own standards for living. It is not the ousting of those who think or operate differently, nor is it the unevaluated adherence to externally-imposed ideals. It is, in fact, the inevitable result of living in alignment with one’s values—for how could such a life not be excellent? Excellence recognizes the lie of comparison, as each person is fundamentally and distinctly on a tailored journey rich with inclinations unique to their intents.

Identify your adversary; pursue your own version of better in the face of it. 

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #023 - What Are You Fighting For? | November 12, 2023

What Are You Fighting For?


Renowned author and psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi talks about something called psychic entropy: the diminished mental state we enter when forces seem to be working against our goals. We find ourselves in cycles of pushing and pulling, chasing and tugging, wondering if what we’re fighting for is worth the payoff, if the turmoil will one day lead to triumph.

There are times when life may feel like a battle to live, bringing us to a point where we have to ask ourselves if the pain of fighting is worth what we’re fighting for. To answer this requires that we actually be fighting for something.

This is how we breed resilience before an event breeds it for us—we identify what it is we’re fighting for. Life should not and need not perpetually feel a fight, but when it does, there must be something on the other side worthy of persistence. It is difficult to come back from something when you have nothing you want to come back to. Our task in an inevitably chaotic world is to identify the idea or pursuit so meaningful to us that no left-field occurrence has a real chance at thwarting it. 

In the wake of frustrating news, what are you still motivated toward? What compels you to keep giving your best when it feels as though the world is handing you its worst? It doesn’t have to be lofty, but it does have to exist. Be it vague or concrete, this is what turns resilience from the exception in the individual to the rule—the standard by which we operate. 

Resilient people have something worth being resilient for. This person, as Marcus Aurelius iterates in Book IV of Meditations, "makes use of [all] material to leap ever higher." 

Know what you're leaping toward; keep leaping.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #022 - What Is Your Advantage? | October 29, 2023

What Is Your Advantage?


The Stoics, Seneca and Epictetus especially, spoke frequently about the value gained from adversity. Seneca goes as far as to say that those who have gone unchallenged in life should be pitied, "for he is not permitted to prove himself."

Natural as it is to pursue a life free from adversity, just as naturally should we equip ourselves to find the opportunity in life's inevitable blows. Strengthened character, enhanced perspective, resilience—any misfortune presents the opportunity for increased resolve.

It can be reasonably difficult to see the benefit in every situation. There are some situations which feel so bleak, one might be offended at the idea of being asked to find the benefit in it. But we benefit from asking ourselves what advantage it gives us. 

"A boxer derives the greatest advantage from his sparring partner," says Epictetus in Book III of Discourses And Selected Writings, "and my accuser is my sparring partner. He trains me in patience, civility, and even temper."

Your advantage could be an indestructibility cultivated through turmoil that enables you to withstand while others wither. It could be an area of expertise honed over the years that grants a unique edge in a certain pursuit. Perhaps your advantage is a set of circumstances that yielded an appreciation so deep that your experience of life is richer and more vivid, enabling you to create more, give more, live more.

Be it tactical, mental, or emotional, you have an advantage. Operate from it.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #021 - It Will Be Taken Away | October 22, 2023

It Will Be Taken Away


Chief among qualities of the Stoics was an acceptance of their own transience, often citing impermanence as a precise basis for perspective. A passage of Meditations finds Marcus Aurelius prompting us toward appreciation by asking us to ponder how much we'd miss what we have if it were to be taken from us. 

Basic laws of chaos, aging, and mortality assure us that loss of any and every kind is not a possibility, but a definite. 

The question we're left with is the following: What does the inevitable removal of that which we claim to cherish mean for how we engage or treat it now? More poignantly, what does the fact that you won't always live where you live, that your health may not come as easily in the future, and that the lives of those around you are changing and evolving at just as rapid of a pace as your own mean for how you operate in the present?

Our challenge is remaining conscientiously aware that something or someone being there does not mean that it or they always will be. This is not a matter of our ability to eventually adapt to any reality, but of our tendency to delay meaningfully engaging a reality until it's threatened. As with anything difficult to anticipate, we train by preparing—by living in such a way that if everything changed, there is little left for us to regret.

The inevitability of the end of anything demands a conscious audit of everything—of what we claim to appreciate and of whether or not we're actually doing so. Appreciation expressed is active, and in its best form, urgent. 

In no uncertain terms, it will all be taken away. Amidst entropy, presence and intent are our strengths.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #020 - Everything Is For Our Benefit | October 1, 2023

Everything Is For Our Benefit


Central among Stoic advisements is not only that of owning our reactions to any stimuli, but our interpretations of them. Our experience is in the interpretation (for better or worse). 

In Meditations, Marcus Aurelius reminds us that the power to reframe any instance lies with us. “For the mind adapts and converts everything that impedes its activities into something that advances its purpose," Aurelius says, "and a hindrance to its action becomes an aid, and an obstacle on its path helps it on its way.”

We must intend everything for our benefit. Endowed with reason, we have the ability to choose how we see things, how we interpret the people and events that make up our lives, and how we respond. Any and every occurrence presents us with an opportunity to become better if we see it as such.

Author Ryan Holiday effectively captures this concept in The Obstacle Is The Way with the following: “Discipline in perception lets you clearly see the advantage and the proper course of action in every situation—without the pestilence of panic or fear.”

Discipline in perception. Not discipline in practice, or action, or anything else by which we’re used to “discipline” being an adjacent idea, but perception. Being disciplined in perception means that at first exposure to any situation, we’re immediately responsible for and in immediate control of the thoughts we form thereafter. It’s a level of accountability beyond anything we’ve been taught, and one that will avail us to experiences richer than any we’ve had.

Discipline in perception reframes our past and invigorates our present, freeing us to decide how the uncontrollable affects us.

May we decide well.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward it along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #019 - Live Deliberately | September 17, 2023

Live Deliberately


Australian Olympic swimmer Grant Hackett credits his psychologist for giving him the following paraphrased advice: Do more things that make you feel like you. 

What’s worth noting about this phrasing is that it’s specifically not, do what makes you happy (though doing what makes you feel like you may inevitably breed feelings of happiness). Rather than chasing a vague emotion, this distinct phrasing encourages the pursuit of concrete modes of operating proven to make us feel like ourselves. In the words of Jack Butcher, “life seems to be the process of getting better at being yourself." 

The shortness, or perhaps more aptly, fastness of life requires deliberate living in response. Our task is to take the time to identify the incongruent actions in our lives—those out of alignment with who we aim to be—and recalibrate.

One of the first acts in what philosopher and playwright Seneca would describe as "ordering one’s life properly" is deciding what it means for, in his words, "the whole of it [to be] well invested." As we're unable to predict with precision the number of years we'll actually have, living well rests fully on investing oneself in the season they’re in. Doing this repeatedly is what makes a good life, committing wholly to the season at hand—and the next, and the next. 

In this approach, we’re freed from feeling as if we need to experience everything it is we want right now. Living well requires only that we give ourselves fully to wherever it is we find ourselves, leaving little room for regret as a result.

Live now; live deliberately.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward it along to someone, and catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #018 - The Only Thing Worth Fearing | September 3, 2023

The Only Thing Worth Fearing


As the Stoics iterate, all we control is our output—our efforts and what we think of them. Epictetus depicts this effectively in Discourses and Selected Writings when he shares the example of a performing musician who errs only when he succumbs to the illusion that he actually had any control whatsoever over the audience's reception. 

Epictetus goes on to describe the physical manifestation of this illusion: nervousness—that pesky, sweat-inducing state in which suddenly all that matters is another’s perception of you. It’s as absurd as it is natural. As Shakespeare famously wrote, "all the world’s a stage," and the nature of being calls us to perform daily.

In knowing this, we’re left with only one way to overcome the potentially debilitating states of nervousness and anxiety: acknowledging that our peace must begin and end with our efforts alone. This frees us from expectation, allowing us a clear space to determine what fears are worth possessing.

And so, what is worth fearing? Living in a diminished state should your worst fears come true. The power of cognition is the ability to anticipate—to imagine, visualize, and prepare. The Stoics were masters at reminding themselves of how easily anything could change at any moment, and trained a sort of proactive resilience as a result.

Fear not being ready for whatever it is you refuse to anticipate; prepare now.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #017 - What If You Weren't Allowed To Fail? | August 20, 2023

What If You Weren't Allowed To Fail?


There is no shortage of prompts to encourage us toward some form of reflective action. From, "What if you only had six months to live?" to "What would you do if you were given ten million dollars?", we are not want for life-clarifying thought experiments. While intended to be illuminating, what these prompts lack is any impression of our own accountability within the urgency presented.

The six-months-to-live prompt hinges on an externally-provisioned expiration date to which we're likely to respond with some degree of frivolity. The ten-million-dollars prompt might be even less productive in that it very bluntly requires no effort from the recipient. 

Along these same lines is that of, "What would you do if you couldn't fail?" More useful on the surface, its built-in contingency that is a perfect outcome regardless of the quality of inputs renders it less than effective.

Sustained, considered action requires a more pointed prompt: What if you weren't allowed to fail? Now, before the mere notion of this floods our minds with images of stress and overwhelm if pursued unhealthily, it serves us to remember that, as Marcus Aurelius reminds us, nature gives us nothing that we cannot bear. We also get to decide what failure looks like, as loosely or as specifically as we deem useful.

What this phrasing forces is not just clarity in what we want, but clarity in what we're willing to do to get there. We also find useful instruction in this area from Epictetus. "First, tell yourself what you want to be, then act your part accordingly."

What practical steps would you take if you weren't allowed to fail at [insert any pursuit you've deemed worthy, minor or major]? Proceed.

If you enjoyed this, feel free to forward along to someone. Also, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #016 - Don't Be Greedy | August 6, 2023

Don't Be Greedy


A German science fiction film titled Paradise depicts a near future in which people can extend their lives by "borrowing" time from others. Though a less-emphasized plot point, the film's fictionalized world where time is a commercialized product hinges on one concerning requirement: people who are willing to give up theirs. Hyperbole aside, it's a concept with which we're much more subtly comfortable than we may realize.

Each passing day (hour, minute) is a unit of time given away doing something. The inevitability of time passing somehow convinces us that we will always have time, a sensation that presents the risk of feeling entitled to it. We then live as if the continuation of our own pockets of time is inevitable, often delaying the meaningful until we're jolted into consciousness by way of some perspective-shifting event (including, but not limited to aging).

Stoic wisdom reminds us that we can renew our experiences of time by recognizing both how much and how little of it we have. Life is both long and fast. Acts of randomness preclude our ability to entirely influence the former, but conscious living allows us to contentedly face the latter. Addressed practically, Seneca implores us to "cultivate an asset which the passing of time itself improves." This means taking care of our minds and bodies so as to increase the chances of effectively withstanding whatever life and aging may bring about. 

Make no mistake: not wielding our time well is to be greedy with it—to assume that we can waste it because we expect more of it. We can't add more time, but through intention and reflective consideration, we can give more to the time that we have.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #015 - Be Sharpened Along The Way | July 23, 2023

Be Sharpened Along The Way


A distinguishing element of the Stoics was the following: they accepted reality—the real, the here, and the now. It wasn’t a passive acceptance they exhibited (read: one of succumbing), but an active one marked by a commitment to operating at their highest capacity within the circumstances they found themselves. 

In Sharon Lebell’s interpretation of Epictetus’ works The Art of Living, we find this encouragement: "Pursue the good ardently. But if your efforts fall short, accept the result and move on." Act, learn, adjust, repeat.

What we’re to combat in the wake of any disappointment despite best efforts is the notion that the outcome renders the actions insignificant. Much of what we seek requires both effort and circumstance; Stoic resolve both aids and results from a focus on the former. Occurrences of goal-circumstance misalignment shouldn't damper our commitment to intentional, targeted action, but amplify it, reminding us that consistency makes its coinciding with the rightcircumstances likely, too. 

Outcomes being equal, action sharpens us along the way, illuminating where to improve, what to eliminate, and so on. Effort does not entitle us to specific results; consistency, however, improves our aim. Action is our strength whatever the results may be.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #014 - Preparing For Disaster | June 24, 2023

Preparing For Disaster


An excerpt from Letters from a Stoic finds philosopher Seneca writing about a man whose town was destroyed by a fire. “It is a disaster by which anyone might be shaken,” Seneca writes, “let alone a person quite devoted to his hometown.” One of the perhaps less-highlighted attributes of the more prominent Stoics was their empathy—their understanding and acknowledgement of the human’s natural reaction to life’s dealings. 

Accordingly, Seneca recognizes the validity of this man’s devastation. What he also recognizes is something quite profound as we consider our own emotional responses to what we’d perceive as misfortune: “What is quite unlooked for is more crushing in its effect, and unexpectedness adds to the weight of a disaster. The fact that it was unforeseen has never failed to intensify a person’s grief.”

The unexpectedness of an event intensifies it. What philosophy affords us is the opportunity to preemptively reduce the weight of disaster by becoming the person who can productively respond to any perceived disaster now. Philosophy is training that enables us, per Epictetus, to treat any one of life's challenges as a sparring partner.

May all difficult matters we face be sharpeners along our way.

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.

PhilosoBits Biweekly #013 - Deciding How To Think | June 11, 2023

Deciding How To Think


English painter Sir Joshua Reynolds is credited with saying that “there is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labor of thinking.” The phrasing carries impact, revealing a defining quality of critical thinking that has us slow to engage it: its perceived laboriousness. It’s not so much the function of thinking we’re averse to, but the function of challenging it, of choosing to assess its merit further. In Meditations, Stoic philosopher and Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius tells of how he "escaped the power of circumstance" by recognizing that the harm was not outside him, but within his judgements—within his own thinking.

Implicit throughout Stoic texts is the encouragement of accountability for everything that happens to us by way of owning our thoughts about them. Put another way, what we control in our experiences is how we experience them. Understood in its fullness, our capacity for thinking is the superpower that arms us to adopt the useful perspective in all things. Purposeful thinking allows us to decide what we make of any given moment.

Engage your capacity for thinking by deciding how it is you want to think. The default perception, or the loudest perspective, need not be the only one. 

If you enjoyed this, catch up on the latest long-form blogs here.